Harvest Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) System
The highest stem cell concentration and yield as compared to five other systems used to prepare bone marrow concentrate, as shown by the data below.
Device | Mean Nucleated Cell Count (106 /mL) | Mean Nucleated Cell Yield (Percent) | Reference |
---|
Device | Mean Nucleated Cell Count (106 /mL) | Mean Nucleated Cell Yield (Percent) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Harvest® SmartPrep® 2 Multicellular Processing System | 98.1 ± 61.9 | 70.8 ± 6.0 |
Kevy SV and MS Jacobson, “Comparative Analysis of Bone Marrow Concentrates Prepared by the Harvest® Terumo BCT System and the Cytomedix™ Angel® System.” 2013, unpublished raw data. Request the article |
Cytomedix™ Angel® Whole Blood Separation System (Arthrex) | 20.5 ± 11.2 | 16.1 ± 1.1 |
Device | Mean Nucleated Cell Count (106 /mL) | Mean Nucleated Cell Yield (Percent) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
SmartPrep 2 System | 78.32 ± 33.5 | 67.3 ± 10.2 | Kevy SV and MS Jacobson, “Comparison of Bone Marrow Concentrates Prepared by the Harvest/Terumo BMAC® System and the Thermogenesis Res-Q™ 60 System.” 2012, unpublished raw data. Request the article |
Thermogenesis Res-Q™60 BMC System | 50.74 ± 16.27 | 43. ± 17.3 |
Device | Mean Nucleated Cell Count (106 /mL) | Mean Nucleated Cell Yield (Percent) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
SmartPrep 2 System | 101.48 ± 64.13 | 66.52 ± 19.49 | Hegde V, et al., “A Prospective Comparison of Three Approved Systems for Autologous Bone Marrow Concentration Demonstrated Nonequivalency in Progenitor Cell Number and Concentration.” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2014; 28(10): 591–598. Request the article |
Biomet BioCue™ | 90.81 ± 61.05 | 62.34 ± 28.29 | |
Arteriocyte Magellan® | 38.17 ± 22.58 | 32.55 ± 13.72 |
Device | Mean Nucleated Cell Count (106 /mL) | Mean Nucleated Cell Yield (Percent) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
SmartPrep 2 System | 75.4 ± 38.0 | 69.5 ± 4.1 | Kevy SV and MS Jacobson, “Comparative Analysis of Bone Marrow Concentrate and Platelet Rich Plasma Prepared by the SmartPRep 2 System and the EmCyte Elite System.” 2014, unpublished raw data. Request the article |
EmCyte Elite System | 63.1 ± 51.4 | 45.4 ± 23.3 |